ethica

Spinozas ethics and various translations, edited for easy post processing.
git clone https://git.repetitions.de/ethica

3ad1e.md (1763B)


 1 We have said above, in the note to Prop. ix. of
 2 this part, that desire is appetite, with consciousness thereof;
 3 further, that appetite is the essence of man, in so far as it is
 4 determined to act in a way tending to promote its own
 5 persistence.  But, in the same note, I also remarked that,
 6 strictly speaking, I recognize no distinction between appetite
 7 and desire.  For whether a man be conscious of his appetite or
 8 not, it remains one and the same appetite.  Thus, in order to
 9 avoid the appearance of tautology, I have refrained from
10 explaining desire by appetite; but I have take care to define it
11 in such a manner, as to comprehend, under one head, all those
12 endeavours of human nature, which we distinguish by the terms
13 appetite, will, desire, or impulse.  I might, indeed, have said,
14 that desire is the essence of man, in so far as it is conceived
15 as determined to a particular activity; but from such a
16 definition (cf. II. xxiii.) it would not follow that the mind can
17 be conscious of its desire or appetite.  Therefore, in order to
18 imply the cause of such consciousness, it was necessary to add,
19 in so far as it is determined by some given modification, &c.
20 For, by a modification of man's essence, we understand every
21 disposition of the said essence, whether such disposition be
22 innate, or whether it be conceived solely under the attribute of
23 thought, or solely under the attribute of extension, or whether,
24 lastly, it be referred simultaneously to both these attributes.
25 By the term desire, then, I here mean all man's endeavours,
26 impulses, appetites, and volitions, which vary according to each
27 man's disposition, and are, therefore, not seldom opposed one to
28 another, according as a man is drawn in different directions, and
29 knows not where to turn.
30 
31