ethica

Spinozas ethics and various translations, edited for easy post processing.
git clone https://git.repetitions.de/ethica

2p10csc.md (2166B)


 1 Everyone must surely admit, that nothing can be or be
 2 conceived without God.  All men agree that God is the one and
 3 only cause of all things, both of their essence and of their
 4 existence; that is, God is not only the cause of things in
 5 respect to their being made (secundum fieri), but also in respect
 6 to their being (secundum esse).
 7 
 8 At the same time many assert, that that, without which a
 9 thing cannot be nor be conceived, belongs to the essence of that
10 thing; wherefore they believe that either the nature of God
11 appertains to the essence of created things, or else that created
12 things can be or be conceived without God; or else, as is more
13 probably the case, they hold inconsistent doctrines.  I think the
14 cause for such confusion is mainly, that they do not keep to the
15 proper order of philosophic thinking.  The nature of God, which
16 should be reflected on first, inasmuch as it is prior both in the
17 order of knowledge and the order of nature, they have taken to be
18 last in the order of knowledge, and have put into the first place
19 what they call the objects of sensation; hence, while they are
20 considering natural phenomena, they give no attention at all to
21 the divine nature, and, when afterwards they apply their mind to
22 the study of the divine nature, they are quite unable to bear in
23 mind the first hypotheses, with which they have overlaid the
24 knowledge of natural phenomena, inasmuch as such hypotheses are
25 no help towards understanding the divine nature.  So that it is
26 hardly to be wondered at, that these persons contradict
27 themselves freely.
28 
29 However, I pass over this point.  My intention here was only
30 to give a reason for not saying, that that, without which a thing
31 cannot be or be conceived, belongs to the essence of that thing:
32 individual things cannot be or be conceived without God, yet God
33 does not appertain to their essence.  I said that "I considered
34 as belonging to the essence of a thing that, which being given,
35 the thing is necessarily given also, and which being removed, the
36 thing is necessarily removed also; or that without which the
37 thing, and which itself without the thing can neither be nor be
38 conceived."  (II. Def. ii.)
39 
40